Internal Investigations in Saudi Arabia: A General Counsel's Framework

Key Takeaways: Internal investigations have become a discipline in their own right for multinationals operating in Saudi Arabia, with intensifying anti-corruption and anti-money-laundering enforcement by Nazaha and the Public Prosecution intersecting with extraterritorial regimes such as the U.S. FCPA and the UK Bribery Act. A general counsel who mismanages this file can convert one employee's misconduct into corporate criminal exposure.

When to Launch: Early Warning Triggers

A whistleblower report, an unexplained audit finding, a regulator inquiry or a media report each demands immediate assessment. The first and most consequential decision: internal handling or outside counsel? The global rule: the higher the likelihood of senior management involvement or of the matter reaching an enforcement authority, the stronger the case for external counsel, both for independence and to establish legal professional privilege over the investigation's work product.

Privilege: A Protected Report vs. an Exhibit Against You

Reports prepared by or under the direction of counsel for the purpose of legal advice benefit from the professional confidentiality protections of the Saudi Code of Law Practice. Reports prepared by non-legal internal departments may be seizable and usable against the company. Sophisticated companies therefore route the investigation through counsel from hour one and document that chain from the outset, not after the fact.

Running the Investigation: Preservation Through Findings

A sound investigation begins with a litigation hold preventing destruction of relevant data, then a written scope, forensically sound collection of digital evidence, witness interviews under a protocol making clear that counsel represents the company and not the employee, and finally a findings-and-recommendations report. In the Saudi context, all of this must respect the Personal Data Protection Law in handling employee data and the Labor Law in any subsequent disciplinary action.

Self-Disclosure: A Strategic Decision, Not a Formality

Where the investigation reveals a material violation, the board faces the self-disclosure decision: early cooperation with Nazaha, the Public Prosecution or the sector regulator can substantially mitigate liability, but its timing, framing and scope are strategic questions requiring careful balancing of Saudi law with cross-border obligations for companies listed on foreign exchanges. The wrong call at precisely this moment is what creates the landmark cases.

How We Can Help

Our team combines more than twenty years of white-collar defense before the Saudi courts, including money laundering matters, with an institutional compliance methodology aligned to the firm's ISO 37000 governance and ISO 31022 legal risk management certifications, delivering internal investigations, compliance programs and representation before enforcement authorities in absolute confidence.

Confidential line for general counsel: use the contact form below or reach us directly: +966 53 009 9485 | info@althomalilawyer.com | althomalilawyer.com